Log in

View Full Version : another sig


Reyer
03-18-2007, 01:40 AM
heres my attempt at making a 300 signature

i think it looks ok, imessed up abunch but i still think it looks kind of cool

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y35/albinogary/300sig2.gif
Drew
03-18-2007, 08:13 AM
Cool, a beardy hobbit thing.

I think....
LiTHiUM0XiD3
03-18-2007, 09:38 AM
its the dude from 300....
Drew
03-18-2007, 10:24 AM
300 what?
SgtM
03-18-2007, 10:27 AM
300 (http://300themovie.warnerbros.com/)
Maz
03-18-2007, 10:33 AM
Intense mindless violence interrupted by graphic scenes of sex.
plus it looks like the motion picture painting, beautiful.
Drew
03-18-2007, 11:43 AM
Oh moi gawd.

Looks good mind.

And sgtm, you are indeed the keymaster. +rep
luciusad2004
03-18-2007, 12:55 PM
Dont mean to hijack your thread but just out of curiosity who hear has seen 300?

Is it excessively gory? I don't mind a little blood and violence but i don't want to see something that amounts to an ancient version of Saw or Hills Have Eyes.

Also, I'm assuming that by graphic sex scenes you just mean general nakedness and breasts. Its not like watching "artistic" pron is it?
Omega
03-18-2007, 01:45 PM
Dont mean to hijack your thread but just out of curiosity who hear has seen 300?

Is it excessively gory? I don't mind a little blood and violence but i don't want to see something that amounts to an ancient version of Saw or Hills Have Eyes.

Also, I'm assuming that by graphic sex scenes you just mean general nakedness and breasts. Its not like watching "artistic" pron is it?


I've seen it.

I can't say if it was like "Saw" or "The Hills Have Eyes", but there's some scenes in there where a person gets a leg cut off, or a head cut off, or speared in the face. There's also a LOT of blood in this movie (well, more like a realistic amount, but there's a lot of killing).

And the nakedness is just breasts and general nakedness, plus a dude's ass.
Reyer
03-18-2007, 03:57 PM
i Saw it, it was awesome

I'm not sure why no one has heard of it..

I thought it was great, you could have taken a picture in any second of the movie, and it would have looked like a professional photographer had taken it.

They filmed about 3/4ths of the movie inside with green screens.
luciusad2004
03-18-2007, 03:59 PM
I've seen it.

I can't say if it was like "Saw" or "The Hills Have Eyes", but there's some scenes in there where a person gets a leg cut off, or a head cut off, or speared in the face. There's also a LOT of blood in this movie (well, more like a realistic amount, but there's a lot of killing).

And the nakedness is just breasts and general nakedness, plus a dude's ass.

Thanks ill have to think about it. It looks like it could be good, I'm just sort of a pansy when it comes to excessive gore.
Reyer
03-18-2007, 04:01 PM
The acting really wasnt amazing, but the incredible graphics and cinematography, made up for it.
Omega
03-18-2007, 04:11 PM
Well, the movie wasn't really about anything but fighting, so the non-fighting scenes were useless fluff, for the most part.
jdbnsn
03-18-2007, 04:22 PM
I was warned by a friend about this flick, and for the most part he was right. Here is my take; If you know nothing about the battle of Thermopolye historically and love CGI violence, it's a great movie. Very imaginative, action-packed, dramatic (though rittled with over-acting), and visually stunning. Of course, historically butchered (however there were some accuracies) and one-sided. This movie makes monsters of the Persians (modern day Iranians...hmmm...). Oh, well. There was plenty of violence.
a.Bird
03-18-2007, 08:25 PM
Well the movie was based on a Frank Miller graphic novel so yeah, you really can't worry so much about actual history when watching this film.
jdbnsn
03-18-2007, 08:28 PM
the movie was based on a Frank Miller graphic novel

I'm well aware of that, my disappointment came from the fact that the accurate history is actually a better story.
a.Bird
03-18-2007, 08:33 PM
I'm well aware of that, my disappointment came from the fact that the accurate history is actually a better story.

I see.
DaveW
03-21-2007, 12:05 PM
And the nakedness is just breasts and general nakedness, plus a dude's ass.

Lol. I don't know why, but that's funny.

-Dave
Omega
03-21-2007, 08:34 PM
Lol. I don't know why, but that's funny.

-Dave

Well it's true. =/

After the sex scene with King Leonidas and his wife, it shows King Leonidas's ass as he stands naked and looks out over Sparta.
OvRiDe
03-22-2007, 12:20 AM
Great .. Give away the whole plot why don't ya! Now that I know he has sex with his wife whats the point of going to see it!!


;)
Omega
03-22-2007, 12:38 AM
Great .. Give away the whole plot why don't ya! Now that I know he has sex with his wife whats the point of going to see it!!


;)

Well, last time I checked, the movie was about the Battle of Thermopolae, not King Leonidas boning his wife. ;)
DaveW
03-22-2007, 07:57 AM
Now that I know he has sex with his wife

A guy having sex with his wife isn't exactly the biggest giveaway. As far as plot twists go, it would certainly rank in the bottom 5.

-Dave