AGEIA (Creator of PhysX) has fully been absorbed

I know I can run the demo fine, I got it when it was released. I just wanna see if there are any frame rate differences

Some people are reporting lower framerates, however, some people are reporting lower temps as well.... I can't wait for PhysX to be officially released.

Neither can I, now I have seen that it's not just a sales ploy. Good to see that there have been some new games sign up for the PhysX bandwagon also.

Yeah, but Futuremark is going to have problems as Nvidia have 'cheated' by releasing GPU PhysX.

They will probably release an update which will counteract the effect of the Physics in tests, or make them less noticeable. They had the same issue with the quad core Intel processors, there was a huge increase in points when they were first released until they patched it up.

Futuremark has to do something to keep the masses happy.

A little birdie told us that ATi might be getting PhysX as well.

http://www.overclock3d.net/news.php?...ls_for_physx/1

EDIT: Interesting read -
http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/38121/128/

I just thought of something. If you already have a PhysX card and you get a GTX280 would both cards calculate physics or would it dedicate it to the PhysX card or the GPU SLI PhysX lol.

Your right crenn, that was an interesting read.

I think you select a card and let it handle it. However, I see that the high end models will process PhysX very quickly. The actual PhysX driver that enables GPU physX on some cards is finalised.

EDIT: Another interesting article:

http://www.hothardware.com/News/NVID...ng_Allegation/

Also shows that PhysX work offloading for the CPU test can be disabled for the GPU and PPU, and make it run on the CPU.

This deserves it's own post.

ATi Cards are fully capable of running PhysX.... here's one someone prepared recently!
http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=293936