Well, with this type of reference, peer review isn't an issue if the source is just reporting, you mean your work constitutes original research?
Type: Posts; User: dr.walrus; Keyword(s):
Well, with this type of reference, peer review isn't an issue if the source is just reporting, you mean your work constitutes original research?
I could have done with that with my malware research project last year! Though I don't think my tutor would be mad keen on the reference (TheBestCaseScenario, 2010) ;)
I'm not going to argue this any more, but I'll leave this to speak for itself:
No, it's used totally incorrectly. Viruses are described by the OP as independent of malware, and malware is used as a term to describe a specific type. The guide describes a pretty solid method of...
Basically, no. You're using the term malware incorrectly.
Malware is a 'catch-all' term used to describe all forms of malicious software. A virus is malware, A trojan is malware. A worm is...
A virus is a form of malware. Anti-viruses are designed to detect viruses, surely?
What definition of the term 'malware' are you using? Malware is any class of software that is deliberately harmful, including viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, keyloggers etc, and these can quite...