How far off are Flash Based Hard Drives? It's pretty obvious that there's a bottleneck in system performance when the hard drive is being utilized. Since the hard drive spins slow by processor terms, it takes several seconds to retrieve data. It seems as the obvious choice to use Flash based NAND tech for HD's. The slow use use platters and actuators will be gone and PC's should see an obvious rise in speed, but how far off is that? I heard that there was a drive in the works that would store your OS boot in flash and make your boot time a couple seconds, but I haven't heard anything else about this in a while. Any one know?