Want. That looks awesome. 2-3 years it says? At what $5k a battery?
I'd imagine it wont get too positive of a public response. Even though it clearly explains the difference between its 'radioactive' process and what we commonly associate with nuclear processes, all it takes is one stupid person to puncture the battery and claim something blew up in order to start a frivolous lawsuit and a wave of unnecessary battery recalls that ultimately kill a product. Gah, run ons...
I would really like my Thermaltake prizes...Thanks everyone for my wonderful prizes!
Sounds great, what's the catch?
As the radioactive material decays it emits beta particles that transform into electric power capable
Ummmm.. I don't know about you guys. Radioactive or not.
I'm not sticking that on my lap right above my dangle bits. I'll pass on the six limbed children thank you very much.
[edit]
jesus christ tritium dioxide?
tritium!?!?!?1
tritium is whats injected into the plunonic core of a Hydrogen bomb During detonation to gain a Much Higher Yeild. Common uses are the real "glow in the dark" watches and gun sights.
dude tritum dioxide is some dank stuff.
up there with Deuterium.
wonder why they don't use Deuterium instead of Tritum dioxide. Well i guess it is 50x more expensive.
something like 175,000$ a ounce?
We use Deuterium injection in our "newest" class of nuclear weapons.
Yes thats right rest of the world We are still developing nuclear devices.
Make the Tsar bomb look like someone pop'd a pringles can.
Consumers will never see batteries like that. They've had super long life batteries for decades but it would devistate the economy and make thousands of people jobless.