View Poll Results: Should we switch our industry standards? (*Read Below*)

Voters
35. You may not vote on this poll
  • YaY! (We Should)

    12 34.29%
  • Nay! (No, We Shouldn't)

    23 65.71%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

  1. #1
    Wait, What? knowledgegranted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    569

    Default Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    The International Electrotechnical Commission has been trying to push for our standard of Kilobytes, Megabytes, Gigabytes, Terabytes and Petabytes to change to kibibyes, mebibytes, gebibytes, tebibytes and pebibytes. In doing so they believe they would be correcting an issue we have had for years.

    What are your beliefs on the matter?


    It's like JFK announcing the moon mission. He had no expertise in space travel, and no way of knowing if it would work. He just announced "we're going to the moon" and then they made it happen because everyone was on the same page and working towards the same goal. If he had said "well, let's get some people in space, and we'll see how far out we can get, and if I find someone to make a rocket strong enough, we could possibly approach the moon's orbit and maybe land" it wouldn't have happened.

  2. #2
    Undead Pirate d_stilgar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,987

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    I say no. What they should do is grandfather old drives so that they are still fine if 1000gb = Tb, even though that is not true, but that everything produced after a certain date has to be accurate to binary/computer standards.

  3. #3
    Measure once, curse twice nevermind1534's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    3,245

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    Quote Originally Posted by d_stilgar View Post
    I say no. What they should do is grandfather old drives so that they are still fine if 1000gb = Tb, even though that is not true, but that everything produced after a certain date has to be accurate to binary/computer standards.
    I like that idea
    Help my mini city
    Population Industry Transport Security
    Quote Originally Posted by progbuddy View Post
    It's probably the extreme radiation from the nuclear core in your phone. Push the control rod all the way in.
    Quote Originally Posted by UrbanLegend_NY View Post
    I'm not selling it in hell I'm selling it on eBay.

  4. #4
    . Spawn-Inc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,145

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    leave things the way they are... changing it will only mess things up.

    or do what d_stilgar said.

    or drop prices to reflect the actual amount you get but still make it even numbers.
    CPU: Q6600 G0 3.5GHz@1.4v (4.2GHz max) / 4790k 4.8ghz @1.265v
    GPU: 9800GTX /GTX780 hydrocopper
    Ram: Samsung 4GB /gskill 16gb DDR3 1600
    Mobo: EVGA-NF68-A1 680i (P32) /AsRock Extreme6
    PSU: Enermax Galaxy 850Watt /EVGA 850 G2
    HDD: OCZ 120GB Vertex4, Samsung evo 840 250GB
    LCD: Samsung 32" LN32A450, Samsung 226BW 22" wide
    Sound: Logtiech Z 5500
    CPU & GPU: 3x Swiftech MCR320, 2x MCP655, MCW60 R2, Dtek Fuzion V2, 18 high speed yates @ 5v

  5. #5
    Ride on, Bucko. FuzzyPlushroom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Live Free or Die, bitches.
    Posts
    1,164

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    Why they can't make 1.1 "terabyte" drives with one real terabyte - 1,099,511,627,776 bytes - is beyond me. I'd think being able to market "the first honestly-rated platter-based hard drive!" would be worth it.`
    Quote Originally Posted by Mitternacht View Post
    Everyone else had quotes, and I didn't. I figured the next funny thing I see I'd throw in my sig.
    Quote Originally Posted by Luke122 View Post
    Jon, the whole post is about building a bong that changes its own water.
    Gee, it damn sure took me long enough to find and add the origin of the first quote...

  6. #6
    Religiously tolerant. Luke122's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,246

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    Quote Originally Posted by FuzzyPlushroom View Post
    Why they can't make 1.1 "terabyte" drives with one real terabyte - 1,099,511,627,776 bytes - is beyond me. I'd think being able to market "the first honestly-rated platter-based hard drive!" would be worth it.`
    SECOND.

    \m/ d(-_-)b \m/

    R9 290X+Kraken+Corsair H90, Xeon 5649@4ghz, Asus P6T-WS Pro

  7. #7
    Now making cases for the heck of it =) Waynio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Manchester / UK
    Posts
    1,661

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    Quote Originally Posted by d_stilgar View Post
    I say no. What they should do is grandfather old drives so that they are still fine if 1000gb = Tb, even though that is not true, but that everything produced after a certain date has to be accurate to binary/computer standards.
    Quote Originally Posted by nevermind1534 View Post
    I like that idea
    Yeah me too

  8. #8
    If it isn't stock, it's modded! slaveofconvention's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, UK
    Posts
    2,816

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    It'll cost money to change it, and 99% of the population won't notice. This isn't going to happen, even though it should in the interests of honesty...

    Current Projects: Lobo | Unimatrix | High Voltage | Antec 900 Revamp (Phase 2)
    Completed Projects: General Lee | Synergy Green | Liquid Yellow
    Planned Projects: K-9-PC | Limey

  9. #9
    Will YOU be ready when the zombies rise? x88x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    Quote Originally Posted by slaveofconvention View Post
    It'll cost money to change it, and 99% of the population won't notice. This isn't going to happen, even though it should in the interests of honesty...
    /\ This. Sure, it'd be nice, but I don't see it happening, and honestly it really wouldn't make any difference to me if it did happen.

    @FuzzyPlushroom: Simple reason there; it would cost slightly more, and most people would ignore the 'first honestly rated drive', and just see 'oh, well, their 1TB costs more than this other 1TB. I'll get the cheaper one'

  10. #10
    If it isn't stock, it's modded! slaveofconvention's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, UK
    Posts
    2,816

    Default Re: Changing the Industry standard; yay or nay?

    Quote Originally Posted by x88x View Post
    @FuzzyPlushroom: Simple reason there; it would cost slightly more, and most people would ignore the 'first honestly rated drive', and just see 'oh, well, their 1TB costs more than this other 1TB. I'll get the cheaper one'
    This sounds familiar lol - see what I put in a similar thread just last week lol

    Quote Originally Posted by slaveofconvention View Post
    Business... Because if, for example, Seagate started selling 550GB hard disks as 500GB hard disks, they'd lose a fortune to, for example, Western Digital who'd market an identical Drive as 550GB.

    Mr Joe Public would walk into the computer shop with his usual lack of a real clue, see Seagate 500GB sitting next to WD 550GB for the same price, and walk about with the WD....

    Current Projects: Lobo | Unimatrix | High Voltage | Antec 900 Revamp (Phase 2)
    Completed Projects: General Lee | Synergy Green | Liquid Yellow
    Planned Projects: K-9-PC | Limey

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •