The issue of suffocation in a space with greatly restricted area for gas exchange when using live plants:
There is a common myth about using live plants which comes about due to a simplifacation of biochemical processes inside of plant cells and their corosponding mitochondria and chloroplast organelles. That myth is that if you use live plants in an aquarium, those plants will eliminate the need for gas exchange by other methods (air stones, surface agitation and non-sealed off tops). Plants respiration (as due all other aerobic organisms) revolves around this chemical equation (and even here, this is a simplification there are many many more steps):
O2 [oxygen] + C6H12O6 [glucose - aka sugar] = H20 (water) + CO2 (carbon dioxide)
This process takes place in the mitochondria of a plant cell 24/7 365, in light or in dark.
Now with photosynthesis (again, this is simplified) this chemical reaction takes place in the chloroplasts in the presence of significant light reacting with the various pigments, of which the chlorophylls are the most present in green plants, to provide the energy nessecary to combine the first 2 reactants:
H20 + CO2 = C6H12O6 + O2
Also related to this topic is the misconception that a higher level of CO2 drives the level of O2 out of the water. The point at which this would even start to occur would be hundreds of times the CO2 or O2 toxicity level and would have to be done at emmense pressure to the solution due to gas laws and the laws of gas dilution in a liquid. Anyhow, I am getting away from my self here.
Coming back to the 2 chemical equations outlining resipration and photosynthesis...
While plants do take in CO2 and produce O2, they:
1) Only do so in the presence of a significant amount of light
2) Only do so when is respiring at a great enough rate to have extra energy to process (burn in respiration or store) the excess C6H12O6 produced by photosynthesis.
3) The O2 produced by photosynthesis is in an amount suffient to saturate all the O2 requirements of the plant. Plants only release excess O2.
At night, the plants will no longer adsorb CO2 and release O2, thereby drastically lowering O2 saturation of the water column at night. At a low KH (carbonate hardness, a measure of one type of pH buffering capacity of water), in some cases you may also run into problems of radical (read toxic) pH swings and CO2 toxicity. This is generally more the case when using a combination of high lighting (4+ watts per gallon normal flourescents, 3+ watts per gallon Power compact or Metal Halide lighting) high plant density, and direct CO2 addition to the water column even if using a CO2 canister with a pH controlled solenoid valve on the regulator.
And we are also leaving (no pun intended) out one major consumer of O2 and producer of CO2 in a healthy tank. Bacteria. One doesn't have to look past the denitrifying bacteria that should be near and dear to all fish keepers hearts. Look at what is going on in the 'nitrifaction process' also called the 'nitrogen cycle) It might be called something else in Canada and elsewhere, but you'll recognize it when you see it.
The common scenario goes like this:
Fish poop and any other organic nitrogen containing compound => broken down by various [oxygen consuming] bacteria into NH4 (ammonia, may also be NH3, depending on pH, not important to this discourse though). Fish also release 'urine' which is pure NH4, unlike humans for instance which convert NH4 into urea [(NH2)2CO2] in the liver inorder to store it in the body (NH4 is extremely toxic and can't be stored, fish constantly release NH4 through their gills.
NH4 gets broken down by another type of [O2 consuming due to respiration] bacteria and that very simplified equation goes like this:
NH4 + O2 = H2O + NO2 (nitrite) So at this step, you not only have the reaction of O2 with NH4 (thereby removing the O2 from the water) it all takes place inside a bacterium that uses an oxygen-based respiration.
The next step is basically a continuation of this process:
NO2 + O2 = NO3 (nitrate) again, same as above only a different type of bacteria is adding another oxygen to nitrite to make nitrate.
And in anaerobic pockets of a fish tank (usually inside rocks, deep in deep gravel/sand bed, places with extremely low to no water flow) you can have this going on in certain types of anaerobic bacteria:
NO3 = N2 (nitrogen gas) + O2 these cells then use this oxygen in non-respirational chemcial reactions.
The amount of O2 needed to process the food and wastes of an average healthy well-fed (not overfed) betta in a 6 gallon tank outweighs the O2 requirements of the betta itself. Also, massively planted tanks w/o careful control of light, nutrient supplimentation and other factors is bound for disaster. I have also never seen a longterm successful hermetically sealed mini-enviroment. Even Biosphere 2 didn't work out. And no, those little sealed off globes with the elodea and daphnia don't last more than a few months, even under optimum conditions.
In regards to the condensation caused by phasechange coolers (or even high powered TEC's I would assume):
These units typically produce condensation in an extremely specific location, namely the hoses leading up to the cooling 'block', and a small area around and behind the cooling block. An aquarium and its resultant rise in humidity, impellor created mist, and misc spills and splashes isnt so specifically localized. I am also under the impression, as I have no first hand experiance, that when using a phase change system, extensive efforts are made to prevent condensation. I believe most use neoprene in fairly thick layers on the hoses, around the CPU/GPU, and behind the CPU/GPU pcb. I also think many people use lots of die electric grease, silicone sealants and some more exotic materials to combat this very localized condensation. If you were suggesting that because people using phase change systems can deal with the problem, the solutions should hold a straight forward parallelism with dealing with condensation cause by an aquarium. I am not sure that covering every piece of electronics with neoprene, die electric grease or more exotic materials would really be feasible. How would you go about condensation proofing a optical drive? Can't use die electric grease on the laser and neoprene isnt going to work out very well either. Check with people who have experimented with spray painting mobo or pci or agp/pci-e cards. Many components get hot enough to melt/burn off the paint.
I hope this post made some sort of sense. If not, I'll be glad to review and make clarifications.