Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

  1. #11
    Overclocked Lothair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    362

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    That battery is worth it's weight in gold if the charge goes up! SELL SELL SELL! lol

    It sounds like a software issue, unless you're supposed to be getting those numbers? I'd time it against a clock and see if it matches up.

  2. #12
    Over 75 Custom PC's in 20 years TheGreatSatan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern IL
    Posts
    6,633

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    I was getting almost 6 hours when I had a 5400 rpm drive installed and then suddenly after I put in my SSD, my charge time dropped to 3 hours!!
    WH1T3 0U7
    *******************************
    Modified Thermaltake View 37
    Intel 9900K, MSI Z390A, 128GB (32GB x4) GSkill Royal 3200MHz, RTX 3080 Vision, EVGA Nu Audio, 1TB Silicon Power SSD, EVGA 1300G2, ID cooling 360mm AiO, LG 3440 x 1440


  3. #13
    If you can't hack it, you don't own it! Oneslowz28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Aiken, Sc
    Posts
    5,084

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    Depending on how much the SSD is in use, I could see it draining a battery. Do you just have the OS on the SSD or is it your main drive?

  4. #14
    Over 75 Custom PC's in 20 years TheGreatSatan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern IL
    Posts
    6,633

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    It's my only drive. So, everything is on it.

    I already know that it drains faster than a normal hard drive. SSD's pull the same amount of power all the time. Normal hard drives spin up then down and use less power. I just wonder what a laptop battery is designed to handle. Are they built for peaks and lows in power consumption? Or a constant draw at the same rate?
    WH1T3 0U7
    *******************************
    Modified Thermaltake View 37
    Intel 9900K, MSI Z390A, 128GB (32GB x4) GSkill Royal 3200MHz, RTX 3080 Vision, EVGA Nu Audio, 1TB Silicon Power SSD, EVGA 1300G2, ID cooling 360mm AiO, LG 3440 x 1440


  5. #15
    If you can't hack it, you don't own it! Oneslowz28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Aiken, Sc
    Posts
    5,084

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    Well all batteries are designed for a constant current draw rate. This is how manufacturers rate their mAh. The reason no battery gives you the charge time and lifespan they are rated for is fluctuations in the current draw. Its a little more complicated than that but that's the jist of it.

  6. #16
    Mentally Underclocked mDust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,639

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGreatSatan View Post
    It's my only drive. So, everything is on it.

    I already know that it drains faster than a normal hard drive. SSD's pull the same amount of power all the time. Normal hard drives spin up then down and use less power. I just wonder what a laptop battery is designed to handle. Are they built for peaks and lows in power consumption? Or a constant draw at the same rate?
    SSDs do not pull the same amount of power all the time. They have an active and an idle power draw measurement on every SSD that is sold. Generally it's about 3-4 watts seek and <1 watt idle. However, that isn't much different than a lot of notebook drives. The difference is that SSDs don't have to spin up a disk...they just spit the data out and then instantly idle again. So the HDDs spend longer using slightly more power which is why the SSDs are suppose to be more power efficient.
    Your laptop battery is designed to output a certain amount of amps at certain voltages for a certain number of hours...this is measured in milli-watt-hours. The three measures (amps, volts, and time) are all dependent on each other. As output watts (amps x volts) increase, the battery life (time) decreases as it's inversely proportional. If you want longer battery life, the milliwatts have to decrease. If you have HWMonitor installed, you can watch your battery drain in real-time by the numbers. It's fun.
    I'll procrastinate tomorrow.

  7. #17
    Anodized. Again. Konrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,060

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    Disable *all* search indexing on the system drive. You lose the benefits of "fast" searches, you gain 10-20% more usable drive capacity. You also gain maybe 50% more battery life because the drive isn't constantly clicking and indexing itself in the background, you also don't have to defrag as often ... I don't know how much of a difference it makes with an SSD.
    My mind says Technic, but my body says Duplo.

  8. #18
    Mentally Underclocked mDust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,639

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    Quote Originally Posted by Konrad View Post
    Disable *all* search indexing on the system drive. You lose the benefits of "fast" searches, you gain 10-20% more usable drive capacity. You also gain maybe 50% more battery life because the drive isn't constantly clicking and indexing itself in the background, you also don't have to defrag as often ... I don't know how much of a difference it makes with an SSD.
    That's a good idea except for defragging an SSD. SSDs don't ever need to be defragged and shouldn't be, as it destroys them.
    I'll procrastinate tomorrow.

  9. #19
    Anodized. Again. Konrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,060

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    lol, I should've worded it better. I routinely disable indexing on my laptops with wonderful results. Battery life does increase by a large margin because far less power gets constantly drained by "idle" moving parts.

    But I've never used a mobile machine with SSD; I'm not sure if my "tweak" makes any noteworthy differences on performance, longevity, or battery life with SSD components. I agree, defrag isn't necessary on SSD volumes (unless maybe you're preparing for emergency data recovery) and it seems like it would be detrimental in the long term. I'm still leery of the "limited" life of SSD technologies. (Yes, I know SSDs have huge performance gains and are already used in critical enterprise applications ... I'll probably resist until SSD prices and lifespans reach parity with HDD technologies.)
    My mind says Technic, but my body says Duplo.

  10. #20
    Over 75 Custom PC's in 20 years TheGreatSatan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern IL
    Posts
    6,633

    Default Re: SSD Installed and Less Battery time?

    I already had that off, but I did just shut off XPS Services because I never print from my lappy. I also disabled Windows Media Center and DVD Maker because I don't use those either. Then I killed all Windows Games. Does anyone know what XPS Viewer is?
    WH1T3 0U7
    *******************************
    Modified Thermaltake View 37
    Intel 9900K, MSI Z390A, 128GB (32GB x4) GSkill Royal 3200MHz, RTX 3080 Vision, EVGA Nu Audio, 1TB Silicon Power SSD, EVGA 1300G2, ID cooling 360mm AiO, LG 3440 x 1440


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •